<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SAP PI 7.1 &amp; Windows 2008</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mattlestock.com/2008/08/sap-pi-71-windows-2008/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mattlestock.com/2008/08/sap-pi-71-windows-2008/</link>
	<description>Thoughts from your friendly neighborhood webhost.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 06:37:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.mattlestock.com/2008/08/sap-pi-71-windows-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 14:09:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matt.divergentnetworks.com/?p=8#comment-4</guid>
		<description>My apologies,
You&#039;re correct in the fact that 2008 does come in 32bit, but really the memory requirements of the server as well as any service that&#039;s installed on the machine are extremely prohibitive running in a 32 bit environment.
There really isn&#039;t a good reason for installing the 32 bit server on a box capable of 64 bit, especially if you&#039;re going with a Hyper-V install.

As far as upgrading SAP and 2008, those really need to be tackled as two separate projects, simply due to the enormous scope of both upgrades.

Good luck!
Matt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My apologies,<br />
You&#8217;re correct in the fact that 2008 does come in 32bit, but really the memory requirements of the server as well as any service that&#8217;s installed on the machine are extremely prohibitive running in a 32 bit environment.<br />
There really isn&#8217;t a good reason for installing the 32 bit server on a box capable of 64 bit, especially if you&#8217;re going with a Hyper-V install.</p>
<p>As far as upgrading SAP and 2008, those really need to be tackled as two separate projects, simply due to the enormous scope of both upgrades.</p>
<p>Good luck!<br />
Matt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: speedyb</title>
		<link>http://www.mattlestock.com/2008/08/sap-pi-71-windows-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>speedyb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 05:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matt.divergentnetworks.com/?p=8#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Is SAP 7.1 only available on Windows Server 2008 64 Bit?

&lt;cite&gt;Being that 2008 server is only 64bit, there’s no excuse for deploying a box with anything less than 6GB of RAM.&lt;/cite&gt;

I know for a fact that there is a 32 bit version of Windows Server 2008, but some things are not available on 32 Bits such as Hyper-V. Also Exchange 2007 requires 64 Bits to be installed. But I didn&#039;t know for that requirement with SAP 7.1 
I am looking into an upgrade for one of my clients to Server 2008 and he is a SAP user and was thinking about upgrading SAP at the same time..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is SAP 7.1 only available on Windows Server 2008 64 Bit?</p>
<p><cite>Being that 2008 server is only 64bit, there’s no excuse for deploying a box with anything less than 6GB of RAM.</cite></p>
<p>I know for a fact that there is a 32 bit version of Windows Server 2008, but some things are not available on 32 Bits such as Hyper-V. Also Exchange 2007 requires 64 Bits to be installed. But I didn&#8217;t know for that requirement with SAP 7.1<br />
I am looking into an upgrade for one of my clients to Server 2008 and he is a SAP user and was thinking about upgrading SAP at the same time..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
